AI in the Workplace

2 job roles

Business & Operations

Jobs whose whole purpose is forecasting and coordination — the work most often claimed for AI, and where the measured error rates are most sobering.

Demand Planning Analyst, Supply Chain

Forecasting models are standard — and the best one tested still missed by 56%.

Research by Dominique Genovesse

Typical employers Retail · manufacturing · sales and operations functions

What the job is

A demand planning analyst uses data to forecast future product demand, guiding decisions about inventory, production, and supply. Day to day that means structuring daily, monthly, and yearly forecasts, analysing sales numbers, managing current inventory, and presenting findings to the operations unit.

What AI-integrated supply chains reported improving
Service levels: 65% Service levels 65% Inventory levels: 35% Inventory levels 35% Logistics costs: 15% Logistics costs 15%
Figures are percentages. Data: Alicke et al., McKinsey (2021). Chart drawn for this page; the underlying figures are the contributor’s verified sources.

How AI is used today

Forecasting has been substantially reshaped by machine learning, to the point that some practitioners treat it as standard practice in the field — via tools including Microsoft Power BI, Excel Copilot, and Blue Yonder. These systems combine a business's historical data with additional factors such as fluctuating prices, environmental conditions, and social signals. McKinsey's analysis describes demand planning as having "been revolutionized by integrating machine learning and harnessing new sources of data," with firms reporting improvements in inventory levels, speed and quality of service, and logistics costs.

The Mean Absolute Percentage Error for the XGBOOST was 56.18%.

Hossain & Parvin (2025) — the highest error of any model they tested, and a reminder that these systems are not uniformly better than people

What’s changing

The biggest change is a shift in the task mix: less manual input work like spreadsheet editing and SKU-level forecasting, and more oversight to validate what the models produce. That shift needs watching, because the pressure to adopt is partly a talent problem rather than a capability one — McKinsey's 2024 survey of companies pursuing this integration found that "90 percent say that their companies lack sufficient talent to meet their digitization goals." Looking forward, as models improve, forecasting accuracy may rise and in turn invite more dependence and less human oversight.

What a new entrant needs

Beyond baseline fluency with SQL and data interpretation, an entry-level analyst has to understand the blind spots of the models they are using — and be able to validate and in some cases override the forecasts those models produce. This connects directly to Critical Thinking and Judgement, which emphasizes applying routine evaluation methods to verify sources, letting analysts exercise better judgment when drawing conclusions from new data.

Where the evidence disagrees

The models are not uniformly better than human forecasting, and some carry high error rates. A peer-reviewed comparison of statistical and machine-learning models for predicting restaurant demand found "the Mean Absolute Percentage Error for the XGBOOST was 56.18%, which is the highest among the machine learning models," with the model struggling to capture fluctuations in sales of certain products. An analyst has to know which products a given model cannot handle and forecast those independently.

3 sources, located and verified by the contributor
  1. Alicke, K., Dilda, V., Görner, S., Mori, L., Rebuffel, P., Reitr, S., & Samek, R. (2021). Succeeding in the AI supply-chain revolution. McKinsey & Company.
  2. Alicke, K., Foster, T., & Trautwein, V. (2024). Supply chains: Still vulnerable. McKinsey Global Supply Chain Leader Survey 2024.
  3. Hossain, M. S., & Parvin, F. (2025). A comparative study of various statistical and machine learning models for predicting restaurant demand in Bangladesh. PLOS ONE, 20, e0325449.

Project Manager, Financial Services

Scheduling automates; stakeholders, conflict, and AI governance do not.

Research by Natalie Hsu

Typical employers Retail and commercial banks · investment banks · insurers · fintech

What the job is

A project manager in a regulated financial environment coordinates delivery across teams.

Adoption is running ahead of governance
Project professionals using AI: 70% Project professionals using AI 70% Financial firms governing AI responsibly: 30% Financial firms governing AI responsibly 30% 0
Figures are percentages. The two figures come from different surveys and measure different populations. Data: Association for Project Management (2025); Neurons Lab (2026). Chart drawn for this page; the underlying figures are the contributor’s verified sources.

How AI is used today

Adoption is growing unevenly but fast: the Association for Project Management's 2025 survey of 1,000 UK project professionals found 70% now use AI, up from 36% in 2023, with daily use concentrated in status reports, scheduling, and flagging compliance issues for human review. What AI is not doing is replacing a project manager's judgment, or the human work of leading, resolving conflict, and building the relationships that hold a project together.

What’s changing

Repetitive tasks like status tracking and scheduling are shifting to AI while stakeholder management and conflict resolution stay with the project manager. AI is also creating a genuinely new responsibility: governance knowledge. Only about 30% of financial firms have responsible AI practices built into operations, which pushes more of the human-review burden onto whoever is coordinating delivery.

What a new entrant needs

AI fluency is now required rather than optional, and the profession has formalized it — the Project Management Institute added AI literacy as core content to the PMP exam in July 2026. That reflects Human Creativity in the framework: as technical work continues to automate, human connection becomes the real differentiator.

Where the evidence disagrees

Adoption is outpacing governance. Nearly 75% of financial firms use AI while only around 30% govern it responsibly. The word "adoption" is also doing a lot of unexamined work in these surveys — it can mean piloting a single tool or running an AI process end to end, and the figures rarely distinguish the two.

3 sources, located and verified by the contributor
  1. Association for Project Management. (2025, September 9). AI use in project management nearly doubles in just two years, APM survey finds.
  2. Neurons Lab. (2026). AI governance in financial services: How to manage risk.
  3. Project Management Institute. (2026). Learn what the new PMP exam, launched in July 2026, means for you.